At the 2024 Annual Meeting, Restatement of the Law, Children and the Law Tentative Draft No. 6 (TD No. 6) was approved by ALI membership, subject to the discussion at the meeting and usual editorial prerogative. The below black letter is excerpted from this draft, which contains §§ 13.10-13, Transfer to Criminal Court.

The below text does not incorporate edits made subject to the discussion at the meeting and usual editorial prerogative.

§ 13.10. Transfer to Criminal Court; Determinative Factors and Requirement of Particularized Findings

     (a) Unless otherwise provided by statute, a delinquency proceeding involving a youth who was younger than 14 at the time of the alleged offense may not be transferred to a criminal court.

     (b) When the prosecution files a motion to transfer a delinquency proceeding to a criminal court, the prosecution bears the burden of:

          (1) showing probable cause to believe that the youth committed the charged offense; and

          (2) establishing the determinative criteria for transfer under applicable law.

In ruling on the transfer motion, the juvenile court must consider each factor specified in the transfer statute or applicable judicial opinion, make particularized findings on each determinative factor, and explain the decision in sufficient detail to permit meaningful appellate review.

     (c) Unless otherwise provided by statute or applicable judicial opinion, the determinative factors in transfer adjudication are:

          (1) the risk posed by the youth to public safety based on the charged offense, prior delinquency adjudications and interventions, and an assessment of the likelihood of future offending; and

          (2) the youth’s amenability to treatment, services, and other interventions aiming to reduce the likelihood of reoffending that are available in the juvenile system during the period of the delinquency disposition.

     (d) Each youth being considered for transfer is entitled to an individualized psychosocial and developmental assessment prepared by a qualified professional and considered by the court in making the transfer decision. This forensic transfer assessment must include assessment of the youth’s risk of reoffending; need for preventive restraint; responsivity to available treatment, services, and interventions; and needs for healthy development. If a youth being considered for transfer is financially unable to retain a qualified expert, the court must appoint, at state expense, a qualified professional with specialized knowledge of adolescent development and delinquency. The rules governing these assessments are specified in § 13.11.

     (e) Retribution is not a proper basis for transferring the case to a criminal court.

     (f) Unless otherwise provided by statute, a youth may be transferred to criminal court only if the juvenile court judge finds that the youth’s behavior presents a significant risk to public safety that is unlikely to be meaningfully reduced by the treatment, services, and other interventions undertaken during the legally authorized period of the delinquency disposition.

     (g) If the juvenile court waives jurisdiction and issues an order transferring the case to the criminal court, the youth has the right to an expedited interlocutory review of the juvenile court’s ruling.

 

§ 13.11. Youth’s Right to Expert Assessment in Transfer Proceeding

     (a) If a youth under consideration for transfer is financially unable to retain a qualified, independent expert to conduct a transfer assessment, the court must appoint a qualified professional with specialized knowledge of adolescent development and delinquency, at state expense, to assess developmental, behavioral, and clinical issues relevant to the statutory criteria governing transfer, including the youth’s risk of reoffending, needs for healthy development, and responsivity to available interventions and services, and to prepare a report for the defense addressing these issues.

     (b) Use of the report prepared by the expert and information derived from the evaluation and presentation of testimony by the expert are governed by § 13.12.

§ 13.12. Use of Incriminating Disclosures in Connection with Transfer Proceeding

     (a) The privilege against self-incrimination applies in a juvenile transfer proceeding whether it is held in a juvenile court or a criminal court. The privilege is violated by any rule or practice that requires the youth to admit guilt, or acknowledge any inculpatory fact, as a condition of being eligible for juvenile-court jurisdiction.

     (b) No statement made by a youth in a transfer proceeding is admissible over the youth’s objection in any subsequent delinquency or criminal adjudication unless it is introduced in direct contradiction of a statement made by the youth in that subsequent proceeding.

     (c) No statement made by a youth during a pretrial clinical evaluation conducted in connection with a transfer proceeding, or information derived from such a statement, may be used over the youth’s objection in the transfer proceeding, or in any subsequent delinquency proceeding or criminal adjudication, unless it is introduced in direct contradiction of a statement made by the youth or to rebut claims asserted by the defense in that proceeding.

Share

Richard Bonnie

Associate Reporter, Children and the Law

Richard J. Bonnie is Harrison Foundation Professor of Medicine and Law Emeritus at the University of Virginia School of Law, having retired from teaching in 2023. He formerly served as director of the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy at the University of Virginia. ­­He teaches and writes about health law and policy, bioethics, criminal law, and public policies relating to mental health, substance abuse, and public health. He has co-authored leading textbooks on criminal law and public health law.

Emily Buss

Associate Reporter, Children and the Law

Emily Buss's research interests include children's and parents' rights and the legal system's allocation of responsibility for children’s development among parent, child, and state. In recent years, she has focused particular attention on the developmental impact of court proceedings on court-involved children, including foster youth and youth accused of crimes. In addition to courses focused on the subjects of her research, Buss teaches civil procedure, evidence, and family law. 

Clare Huntington

Associate Reporter, Children and the Law

Clare Huntington is an expert in the fields of family law and poverty law. Her book, Failure to Flourish: How Law Undermines Family Relationships (Oxford 2014), won an Honorable Mention for the Professional and Scholarly Excellence (PROSE) Award in Law and Legal Studies from the Association of American Publishers. She has published widely in leading law journals, exploring the intersection of poverty and families and with a recent focus on non-marital families.

Solangel Maldonado

Associate Reporter, Children and the Law

Solangel Maldonado is the Joseph M. Lynch Professor of Law at Seton Hall Law.  Her research and teaching interests include family law, feminist legal theory, race and the law, and international and comparative family law. Over the past decade, her scholarship has focused on the intersection of race and family law and the law’s influence on social norms of post-separation parenthood. She is currently working on a book for NYU Press that examines how the law shapes romantic preferences and how these preferences perpetuate racial hierarchy and economic and social inequality.

Elizabeth S. Scott

Reporter, Children and the Law

Elizabeth S. Scott is the Harold R. Medina Professor of Law at Columbia Law School. Scott teaches family law, property, criminal law, and children and the law. She has written extensively on marriage, divorce, cohabitation, child custody, adolescent decision-making, and juvenile delinquency. Her research is interdisciplinary, applying behavioral economics, social science research, and developmental theory to family/juvenile law and policy issues.

Jennifer Morinigo

The American Law Institute