A Law360 article discusses a recent case in which a Minnesota dental office argued that “more courts across the country have rejected insurers’ bids to dismiss COVID-19 business interruption suits for policies without a virus exclusion.” 

The dentist cited data from the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School’s Covid Coverage Litigation Tracker, an empirical study on insurance disputes and resolutions during the pandemic, which shows that courts have denied the insurers’ dismissal bids in 10 cases while granting them in eight cases concerning policies that do not have a virus exclusion. 

Read the full piece here.